Forum Replies Created
-
Posts
-
Go for it! If you can improve upon it, I’m sure the Russian fans out there would pick yours! I’m happy to give everybody a chance. Sadly I can’t speak towards the quality of them 🙁
Just a note, somebody has since released a full Russian translation. It’s now available on the mods page:
That happens because you need to build up land on either side (at least 2 adjacent tiles) before building over water.
It should work with no problem with Cyrillic symbols. Perhaps send me the file and I can see what the issue is.
Sure, just post it back here, or send it to me via email. I will make sure it’s available on the mods page and announce it’s release.
Auto Pickup will automatically pick-up items on the ground. Auto Gathering will automatically attempt to gather from resources while moving into them (trees, rocks).
Hey there,
I know there’s a few people working on Russian at the moment, but other than that, I am not sure.
Anybody is able to make a translation file by editing this: http://unlok.ca/wayward/language/english.js – Simply load the file as a mod to load your changes.
Using the actions menu then “Inspect” is currently the only way to do this; however, you have to be facing the object you wish to inspect currently. There’s plans to make this a bit better.
Hello Hannibal,
We currently have something in the works for 1.9.1 to possibly replace the wiki in most aspects, but you can let me know if that’s a fair assessment. Here’s the development version of the documentation:
http://www.unlok.ca/dev/documentation.htmlThe issue with any wiki for a beta, continuous developing game is it becomes out of date easily. This was my response to help that.
Let me know of any features you would like to see. I think the wiki could still see some use, in terms of guides, strategies and more general knowledge added to each page.
Here’s a couple pages that may help you locate it:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7079075/where-does-firefox-store-javascript-html-localstoragehttp://superuser.com/questions/320141/firefox-local-storage-and-cache-questions
Maybe it uses the same general locations as Firefox. about:cache should give you a better hint though.
